M.Pandeeswari v. The Superintendent of Police

ORDER This petition is filed seeking direction to the second respondent not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry.

¶2Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that based upon the complaint given by the third respondent herein, enquiry was undertaken in CSR No.692 of 2022 and during the course of investigation, it was found that the issue is purely money transaction and accordingly the parties were advised to approach the concerned Civil Court to redress their remedy, thereby, it was closed.

¶3Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) that the enquiry was closed, nothing survives for further adjudication in this petition. Accordingly. this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

25.04.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes/No tta To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai District, Pudukottai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Thirumayam Police Station, Pudukottai District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN, J., tta

25.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.04.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN M.Pandeeswari ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai District, Pudukottai. 2.State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Thirumayam Police Station, Pudukottai District. 3.Anbarasi ...Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to issue a direction directing the second respondent not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry. For Petitioner : Mr.A.B.Jeeva For R1 & R2 : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side)