M.Duraisami v. The Superintending Engineer

O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner passed away and the legal representatives of the petitioner have also not approached, in spite of the best efforts made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶2In view of the above, this writ petition is closed as abated. As and when the legal heirs want to agitate their rights, it is left open to them to revive their claim. No costs.

04.10.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No RR To

¶1The Superintending Engineer, Thoothukudi Electrial Distributing Circle, Tangedco, Thoothukudi..

2.The Charirman, Tangedco, K.R.R. Maaligai, 8000, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. RR WP. (MD)No.8840 of 2020

04.10.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.10.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH M.Duraisami ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Superintending Engineer, Thoothukudi Electrial Distributing Circle, Tangedco, Thoothukudi.. 2.The Charirman, Tangedco, K.R.R. Maaligai, 8000, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002 ...Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to refund a sum of Rs.2,32, 469/- with interest 24 percentage within the time stipulated by this Honble Court or intimate me their intention to adjust the above amount in respect of the demand against may above referred other service connections. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai For Respondents : Mr.S.Deenadayalan Special Government Pleader