S.Senguttuvan v. The Director General of Police

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The petitioner was working as Inspector of Police. He was removed from service. The petitioner filed an appeal before the Additional Director General of Police. It was dismissed in the year 2019. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed a mercy petition before the respondent. He has also given a counter claim.

¶3The respondent is directed to dispose of the petition mentioned mercy petition on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter.

¶4The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

11.04.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To The District General of Police, No.1, Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

11.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN S.Senguttuvan ... Petitioner Vs. The District General of Police, No.1, Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004. ... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to dispose of the mercy petition dated 04.12.2020 within a time period stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Aswin Rajasimman for M/s.Lajapathi Roy & Associates For Respondent : Mr.T.Villavan Kothai Additional Government Pleader