- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 26 June 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 8085/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.
¶2After the writ petition was filed, the petitioner R.Balasubramani had passed away. This Court therefore suo motu impleaded B.Chandra as writ petitioner. The original petitioner R.Balasubramani was appointed as Driver in the respondent Corporation on 29.04.1993. He has averred in the affidavit that his marriage was solemnized with one Chandra on 13.04.2014. However, entries to that effect were not made in the service register. Therefore, this present writ petition came to be filed.
¶3The matter was taken up for admission on 11.04.2023 but R.Balasubramani had passed away on 07.04.2023 itself. I therefore called upon the petitioner to obtain legal heir certificate. The matter was adjourned for that purpose.
¶4Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner produced certificate dated 08.05.2023 issued by the Tahsildar, Aundipatti reflecting the name of D.Chandra as the wife of the deceased. The second respondent shall take the same into account.
¶5The petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the second respondent. The second respondent will hold an enquiry. The second respondent take into account all the relevant aspects. If the second respondent is satisfied that during his life time R.Balasubramani had made a request for entering D.Chandra as nominee or that they were husband and wife, then appropriate order shall be passed in favour of D.Chandra. This exercise shall be completed within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶6This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.
26.06.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To
1.The Managing Director,
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA
2.The General Manager, Madurai Region,
26.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN R.Balasubramani ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Managing Director, 2.The General Manager, Madurai Region, ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to make necessary entries in the service records of the petitioner nominating petitioner's wife Chandra as Nominee in terms of Rule 31 of the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Rules. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Govindan For Respondents : Mr.S.Ramachandra Pradeep Standing Counsel
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.