- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 10 April 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 7903/2023
Judgment
O R D E R When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the prayer sought for in this present writ petition has become infructuous.
2.Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
10.04.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No TM To
1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai, Madurai District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Elumalai Police Station, Madurai District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN, J TM Dated 10.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.04.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN G.Malaichamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai, Madurai District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Elumalai Police Station, Madurai District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to grant permission and necessary protection to conduct the "Adal Padal" Programme on 09.04.2023 at 07.00 pm to 10.00 pm in connection with "Thiru Vizha" of Arulmigu Sri Karuppasamy Thirukovil at T.Paraipatti Village, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 05.04.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Manikandan For Respondents : Mr.S.Manikandan Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.