- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 17 April 2023
- Bench
- C.V. Karthikeyan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 8553/2023
Judgment
ORDER The writ petition has been filed in the nature of mandamus, seeking a direction against the second respondent/Joint Sub Registrar, Nilakkottai Sub Registrar Office, Dindigul District to register the sale deed, which had been filed by the petitioner.
2.A direction is given to the petitioner to make an online application and present the sale deed for registration. If it is otherwise in order and the second respondent has no objection, the same may be registered. If there is any objection, the same may be noted in the form of refusal check-slip and issued to the petitioner.
3.As on date, the writ petition is superfluous. No further order is passed. However, the second respondent is directed to pass necessary orders, if the sale deed is again presented for registration by the petitioner.
4.Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands disposed. No costs.
17.04.2023 NCS :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet:Yes/No PNM To
¶1The District Registrar, Registration Office, Dindigul District.
¶2The Joint Sub Registrar, Nilakkottai Sub Registrar Office, Dindigul District.
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. PNM ORDER IN W.P(MD).No.8553 of 2023
17.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:17.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN W.P(MD).No.8553 of 2023 H.Angelin Hemanth ... Petitioner Vs 1. The District Registrar, Registration Office, Dindigul District. 2. The Joint Sub Registrar, Nilakkottai Sub Registrar Office, Dindigul District. ... Respondents Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to register the sale deed in favour of the purchaser Jeya Suresh Jeyaraj the property is situated at Oruthattu Village, Nilakkottai Sub Registrar Office, Nilakkottai Taluk, Dindigul Punja Land in S.No.608/2 for the extent of 67 cents and S.No.608/3 for the extent of 31 cents in total the punja land for the extent of 98 cents. For Petitioner :Mr. T.R.Subramanian For Respondents :Mr.C.Satheesh Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.