- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 12 December 2023
- Bench
- N. Anand Venkatesh
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 9113/2020
Judgment
ORDER When the matter was taken up for hearing, it was brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioner died on 14.12.2021. Till date, no steps have been taken to substitute the legal heirs.
¶2In view of the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed as abated. There shall be no order as to costs.
12.12.2023 Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/No ssb To
1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukkottai.
2.The Tahsildar, Karaiapatti.
3.The Revenue Inspector, Taluk Office, Kariapatti.
4.The Village Administrative Officer, Valukkalottai Village, Kariapatti Taluk.
5.The Joint Registrar No.II, Virudhunagar. N.ANAND VENKATESH.J., ssb Dated :
12.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.12.2023 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Pappu @ Valliammal ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukkottai. 2.The Tahsildar, Karaiapatti. 3.The Revenue Inspector, Taluk Office, Kariapatti. 4.The Village Administrative Officer, Valukkalottai Village, Kariapatti Taluk. 5.The Joint Registrar No.II, Virudhunagar. 6.Jawahar ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the first respondent herein in O.MU.AA5/6390/2017 dated 25.02.2020 as illegal. For Petitioner : No-appearance For Respondents : Ms.D.Farjan Ghoushia for R1 to R5 Mr.M.Kannan for R6
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.