- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 17 October 2023
- Bench
- N. Anand Venkatesh
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 9797/2021
Judgment
O RDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the relief sought for in the present petition cannot survive at this point of time and the writ petition has itself become infructuous.
2.Recording the same, this Writ Petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
17.10.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No ta To The Commissioner, Dindigul Corporation, Dindigul.
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. ta
17.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and W.M.P.(MD)No.7533 of 2021 S.A.Thangaraj ... Petitioner Vs. The Commissioner, Dindigul Corporation, Dindigul. ...Respondent PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the Commissioner Corporation of Dindigul, Dindigul the Respondent herein to allot a wholesale shop in the temporarily established vegetable market site by the Respondent near KT Hospital, Palani Road, Dindigul and in such other temporary markets which the Respondent may choose to establish till Annal Gandhi Market, Dindigul is reopened within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.Y.Prakash For Respondent : No Appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.