- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 6 June 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 6816/2023
Judgment
O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the respondent No.2 not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry.
¶2When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that compromise has been reached between the parties in the enquiry conducted by the Deputy Superintendent of Police.
¶3In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter has become infructuous. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed as infructuous.
06.06.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Indu To
¶1The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Theni, Theni District.
¶2The Inspector of Police, Periakulam Police Station, Periyakulam.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN. J. Indu
06.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN 1. M.Marimuthu 2. S.Vanitha 3. Sivakumar ... Petitioners Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Theni, Theni District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Periakulam Police Station, Periyakulam. 3. Jeyalakshmi.M ...Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to direct the respondent No.2 not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry. For Petitioners : Mr. Mohamed Riyaz A For R1 : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor For R2 : No appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.