VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Siva v. The Inspector of Police

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
10 April 2023
Bench
G.K. Ilanthiraiyanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 6539/2023

Judgment

CRL OP(MD). No.6539 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 10/04/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD). No.6539 of 2023 Siva ... Petitioner / Accused No.1 Vs The State rep by The Inspector of Police, Nagapattinam Town Police Station, (Crime No. 261/2022.) ... Respondent / Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.Ganesh T.V., Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C. PRAYER :-C-32B. For Bail in Crime No. 261 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

The petitioner / Accused No.1, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 30.08.2022 for the offence under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(c) and 29(1) of NDPS Act in Crime No.261 of 2022 on the file of the respondent, seeks bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that on secret information, the Sub-Inspector of Police on 30.08.2022 proceeded to Uppan River Bed, Akkaraikulam and mounted surveillance and at about

09.00 hours, the petitioner along with other accused came there and on seeing the police party, they tried to escape from there. Thereafter, the respondent Police recovered one gunny bag from them, which containing Ganja weighing 21 kgs. Hence, the complaint.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is nothing to do with the offence as alleged by the respondent Police and he is in judicial custody for more than 210 days. CRL OP(MD). No.6539 of 2023

¶4The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner along with other accused was found in possession of Ganja and opposed for granting bail to the petitioner.

¶5Heard. Perused the materials available on record including the First Information Report.

¶6It is seen that the petitioner was found in possession of contraband weighing 21 kgs of Ganja along with other accused persons, which is a commercial quantity. That apart, the petitioner failed to satisfy the twin conditions as contemplated under Section 37 of the NDPS Act and this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- 10/04/2023 / TRUE COPY / /04/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. PS To

1.The Inspector of Police, Nagapattinam Town Police Station.

2.The Superintendent, Central Jail, Trichy.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1 CC to M/s.GANESH T.V, Advocate ( SR-5723[I] dated 12/04/2023 ) ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.6539 of 2023 Date :10/04/2023 ED/BUC/SAR-2 (13/04/2023) 2P 5C

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.