- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 16 October 2023
- Bench
- S.M. Subramaniam, V. Lakshminarayanan
- Case no.
- WA(MD) 639/2019
Judgment
J U D G M E N T [Judgment of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.] Learned counsel for the appellant made a submission that after institution of the Writ Appeal, the appellant preferred an appeal, which was disposed of by the State.
¶2That being the factum, the appellant has to workout his remedy in the manner known to law. With these liberty, the Writ Appeal stands dismissed. No costs.
[S.M.S., J.] [V.L.N., J.]
16.10.2023 NCC : Index :
SJ To:
¶1The Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Chennai.
¶2The Additional Director General of Police, Law and Order, Chennai.
¶3The Deputy Inspector General of Police/ Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli Range, Tirunelveli District.
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. and V . LAKSHMINARAYANAN , J . SJ
16.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN M.Nallakannu ... Appellant /Petitioner -vs- 1. The Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Chennai. 2. The Additional Director General of Police, Law and Order, Chennai. 3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police/ Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli Range, Tirunelveli District. .. Respondents/Respondents Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD) No.17872 of 2014 dated 11.04.2017 For Appellant : Mr.K.P.Narayanakumar For Respondents : Mr.Amjadkhan Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.