- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 11 April 2023
- Bench
- R. Subramanian, S Justice L.Victoria Gowri
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 8223/2023
Judgment
O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.] Challenge in this writ petition is to the proceedings of the Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Nagarcoil, directing an inquiry into the affairs of Aralvaimozhi Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society Limited, under Section 81 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 (for brevity, "the Act").
¶2Section 81 of the Act authorizes the Registrar to order an inquiry with reference to the constitution, working and financial condition of a registered society or any alleged misappropriation, fraudulent retention of any money or property, breach of trust, corrupt practice, or mismanagement in relation to the society.
¶3Though the learned counsel for the petitioner would vehemently contend that no case has been made out for ordering inquiry, we do not think that we can entertain this writ petition at this stage.
¶4Section 81(1) of the Act, which reads as follows: "81. Inquiry.-(1) The Registrar may, of his own motion and shall, on the application of a majority of the board or of not less than one-third of the members or on the request of the financing bank or of the District Collector, hold an inquiry, or direct some person authorised by him by order in writing in this behalf to hold an inquiry into the constitution, working and financial condition of a registered society or any alleged misappropriation, fraudulent retention of any money or property, breach of trust, corrupt practice, or mismanagement in relation to that society or into any particular aspect of the working of that society." is wide enough to cover any situation and inquiry can be directed into the working and financial condition of a registered society or even a probable mismanagement. We, therefore, do not think that we can limit the scope of the Section and require proof of certain financial irregularities to enable the Registrar to order an inquiry. Even the representation, that is submitted by the person authorized after conducting an inquiry under Section 81 of the Act, has been held to be only recommendatory and further action needs to be instituted. Hence, we do not find any merit in this writ petition.
¶5The writ petition fails and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
[R.S.M., J.] [L.V.G., J.]
11.04.2023 NCC : Index : Internet :
krk To:
1.The Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies, O/o.The Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Kanyakumari Region, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.
2.The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Nagercoil Circle, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.
3.The Cooperative Sub-Registrar / Field Officer, Thovalai, Nagercoil Circle, Kanyakumari District. R.SUBRAMANIAN , J . and L.VICTORIA GOWRI , J . krk and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.7572 & 7573 of 2023
11.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.7572 & 7573 of 2023 T.Muthu Sankar ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies O/o.The Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies Kanyakumari Region Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District 2.The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies Nagercoil Circle, Nagercoil Kanyakumari District 3.The Cooperative Sub-Registrar / Field Officer Thovalai Nagercoil Circle Kanyakumari District ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the second respondent vide e.f.701/2023 bjh.Bt.r. dated 06.03.2023 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Shanmugaraja Sethuppathi For Respondents : Mr.R.Baskaran Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.S.Shanmugavel Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.