VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Mathankumar v. The Inspector of Police

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 April 2023
Bench
G.K. Ilanthiraiyanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 6790/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 17/04/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD). 6790 of 2023 Mathankumar ... Petitioner/Accused No.2

Vs., State rep., by The Inspector of Police, Pudukkottai PEW Police Station, Pudukkottai District. (In Crime No.1157 of 2022) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.N.Marivel, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.T.Senthilkumar Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C. PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.1157 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/A2, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 26.12.2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 8

(c), 20(b)(ii)(c) and 25 of NDPS Act in Crime No.1157 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that on 26.12.2022, the respondent police, based on the secret information, conducted an inspection at Pudukkottai Bus Stand, at that time, the accused persons were standing in the bus stop in a suspicious manner and on enquiry, it revealed that they have in possession of 20.750kg of Ganja in their bag. Hence, the complaint.

¶3Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the entire materials available on record including the First Information Report.

¶4There are totally two accused, in which, the petitioner is arrayed as A2. The petitioner along with other accused person were found in possession of contraband weighing 20.750kgs of Ganja. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that even according to the prosecution, no independent witness was examined. It is seen that the ground raised by the petitioner can be agitated before the trial Court during trial, since it is the matter for evidence. Admittedly, the petitioner along with other accused person were found in possession of contraband weighing 20.750kgs and it is the commercial quantity, that apart the petitioner failed to fulfil the twin conditions as contemplated under Section 37 of the NDPS Act before this Court. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. sd/- 17/04/2023 / TRUE COPY / /04/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. RMK TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PUDUKKOTTAI PEW POLICE STATION, PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT 2 THE SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL PRISON, TRICHY. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.6790 of 2023 Date :17/04/2023 PKP/MMS/SAR-2/27.04.2023/ 2P/4C

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.