C.Kala v. The Commissioner

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.The petitioner is facing the petition mentioned disciplinary proceedings. She wants to mark the petition mentioned Compact Disk in the said proceedings. No exception can be taken to the said request. The value and relevance of the evidence to be adduced is for consideration and decision of the tribunal. The stand of the petitioner is that marking the compact disc is necessary to establish her defense. The petitioner is already having a copy of the same. The first respondent is directed to permit the petitioner to mark the same during cross-examination of the concerned witness.

3.This writ petition is allowed accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

12.04.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No NCC : Yes / No MGA To

1.The Commissioner, The Tribunal for Disciplinary Proceedings, Tirunelveli.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Detachment, Tirunelveli District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

12.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN C.Kala ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Commissioner, The Tribunal for Disciplinary Proceedings, Tirunelveli. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Detachment, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to allow the petitioner to have the CCTV footage being produced on 16.12.2022 in the form of CD (Compact Disk) marked as a material object on petitioner side and to get it screened while subjecting the witnessess for cross examination in connection to case in T.D.P .No. 5 of 2022 pending on the file of the first respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Anand For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader