- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 18 April 2023
- Bench
- C.V. Karthikeyan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 8776/2023
Judgment
O R D E R When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and he has also made the following endorsement : "Kindly permit me to withdraw the writ petition."
¶2In view of the above submission and endorsement made, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
18.04.2023 Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No NCC : Yes / No RM To
1.The District Registrar (Administration), Palani, Dindigul District.
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. RM
18.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN Senthilkumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Registrar (Administration), Palani, Dindigul District. 2.Chellammal 3.S.John ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to hold an enquiry for cancelling the fraudulent registered sale deeds in Document No.178/1997 dated 05.02.1997 and Document No.331/1997 dated 28.04.1997 before the Sub - Registrar, Keeranur, under Section. 77-A of the Registration Act. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Venkatesh For Respondents : Mr.M.Prakash - for R1 Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.