VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Murugan V v. The Commissionerate of Land Administration

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
30 March 2026
Bench
S Justice S.Srimathyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 8593/2026

Judgment

O R D E R This petition has been filed seeking to direct the respondents to rectify the erroneous classification entered in the revenue records including the patta and 'A' register and issue fresh patta in the name of the petitioner and other co-owners in respect of the properties in Survey Nos.812/13, 812/16 to 19, 812/27, 812/28, 812/29 and 812/33 to 36, Seydunganallu Village, Srivaikuntam Taluk, Thoothukudi District in light of the judgement and decree passed in O.S.No.120 of 1998 dated 20.07.1999 based on the representation dated

28.07.2025 given by the petitioner within the stipulated time fixed by this Court.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the rightful owner of the property in Survey No. 812, based on sale deeds dated

28.02.1983 and 28.03.1984. This claim arose when the respondents attempted to construct police quarters on the property. Consequently, the petitioner filed a suit in O.S. No. 120 of 1998 before the District Munsif Court, Srivaikuntam, praying declaration and injunction. The suit was decreed in favor of the petitioner on

30.07.1999. Aggrieved over the same, the 2nd respondent filed an appeal in A.S. No. 9 of 2000 before the Principal District Court, Thoothukudi, which was dismissed on 29.03.2001. No second appeal was subsequently filed. The litigation had attained finality in the matter, and the petitioner is now seeking reclassification in order to obtain a Patta.

¶3The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents was filed.

¶4Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the reclassification issue should be reviewed by both the District Collector (2nd respondent) and the Commissioner of Land Administration (1st respondent). Therefore, the petitioner's application shall be considered by the District Collector (2nd respondent) within 12 weeks from the receipt of this order. If the District Collector (2nd respondent) is not satisfied, the papers shall be forwarded to the Commissioner of Land Administration (1st respondent), who will then review the classification issue. The Commissioner of Land Administration shall complete this review within 8 weeks from receiving the District Collector's report.

¶5With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

30.03.2026 Index : Yes / No

Internet : Yes NCC : Yes / No

msrm To

¶1The Commissioner of Land Administration Department, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.

¶2The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

¶3The District Revenue Officer, Thoothukudi District.

¶4The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District.

¶5The Tahsildar, Srivaikuntam Taluk, Thoothukudi District.

¶6The Village Administrative Officer, Seydunganallur, Thoothukudi District.

¶6The Additional Government Pleader, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai S.SRIMATHY, J msrm

30.03.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY V.Murugan ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Commissioner of Land Administration Department, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. 2. The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi. 3. The District Revenue Officer, Thoothukudi District. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District. 5. The Tahsildar, Srivaikuntam Taluk, Thoothukudi District. 6. The Village Administrative Officer, Seydunganallur, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to rectify the erroneous classification entered in the revenue records including the patta and 'A' register and issue fresh patta in the name of the petitioner and other co-owners in respect of the properties in Survey Nos.812/13, 812/16 to 19, 812/27, 812/28, 812/29 and 812/33 to 36, Seydunganallu Village, Srivaikuntam Taluk, Thoothukudi District in light of the judgement and decree passed in O.S.No.120 of 1998 dated 20.07.1999 by considering the representation dated 28.07.2025 given by the petitioner within the stipulated time fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.M.P.Senthil For Respondents : Mr.SRA.Ramachandran Additional Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.