Chinnathambi Amabalam v. The District Collector

ORDER The writ petition has been filed in the nature of mandamus seeking a direction to the second respondent / The District Revenue Officer, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram, to conduct an enquiry consequent to a representation dated 01.09.2020 given by the petitioner to rectify the extent mentioned in the UDR A-register and computerized patta as 0.40.00 ares relating to property in S.No.184/7 at Arasur village, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.

¶2The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents stated that the petitioner had given an application which is now pending before the second respondent. There is a dispute with another private individual who has not been impleaded as a party to the writ petition.

¶3However, since the enquiry is pending before the second respondent, direction is given to the second respondent to ensure that notice is given not only to the petitioner but also to the other persons who are directly or indirectly connected with the registration of the aforementioned lands and thereafter in the manner known to law, conduct an enquiry and conclude the same on or before 31.08.2023.

¶4This writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

12.04.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No pnn To

1.The Tahsildar, Madurai East Taluk, Madurai District.

2.The Head Surveyor, Madurai East Taluk, Madurai District.

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. pnn

12.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN Chinnathambi Ambalam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 3.The Tahsildar, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the second respondent to conduct an enquiry based on the petitioner's representation dated 01.09.2020 and to rectify the wrong extent mentioned in the UDR A-register and computerized patta as 0.40.00 ares with regard to the property in survey no. 184/7 situating in Arasur village, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.Jeyakarthik For Respondents : Mr.N.Muthuvijayan Special Government Pleader