- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 13 April 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 6824/2023
Judgment
O RDER
This petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to instruct the 2nd respondent as to not to harass the petitioner under the guise of complaint or enquiry without any basis.
2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that no complaint has been received either from the third respondent or any other persons.
¶3Considering the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this matter has become unnecessary now. Hence this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.
13.04.20223 NCC:Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Indu G.ILANGOVAN. J. Indu To
1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Kadaladi Police Station, Ramanathapuram District
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
13.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD) No.6824 of 2023 Nivetha ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Kadaladi Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. 3.Thiayagarajan ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to direct the 1st respondent to instruct the 2nd respondent as to not to harass the petitioner under the guise of complaint or enquiry without any basis. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Karuppasamy Pandiyan For R1 and R2 : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.