K.Santhakumari v. The Director General of Police

ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent.

¶2In the cause title, the second respondent has been erroneously described as working in Madurai. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner clarifies that the second respondent against whom action is sought to be taken, is working at Chennai. If that be so, cause of action has not arisen within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court. The current residence of the petitioner at Madurai will not confer jurisdiction on this Court. The petitioner has to necessarily file a proper writ petition before the Principal Seat.

¶3Granting such liberty to the writ petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs.

13.04.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To The Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai Mylapore, Chennai-600004.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

13.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN K.Santhakumari ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai Mylapore, Chennai-600004. 2.Vathana Police Constable No.35863 The District Collector, District Collector Office, Madurai. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the second respondent for violating Rule 23 of Tamil Nadu Police Subordinate Service Rules, 1973 based on the petitioner's representation dated 01.03.2020 within stipulated time. For Petitioner : Mr.T.A.Ebenezer For Respondents : Mr.T.Villavankothai Additional Government Pleader for R1