- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 28 November 2023
- Bench
- N. Anand Venkatesh
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 10012/2021
Judgment
O R D E R This Writ Petition was filed challenging the entire impugned Tender proceedings of Tender Invitation No.1/2021-2021/va1/Naka. vava/Trichi dated 18.05.2021 issued by the third respondent in respect of the Works items 2 to 5 and consequently directing the 3rd respondent to conduct the fresh tender in respect of works items 2 to 5 and accept the petitioner's valid tender in respect of the works items 2 to 5 already submitted on 27.05.2021 at 01.32 p.m. (or) proceed with fresh tender proceedings.
¶2When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents brought to the notice of this Court Paragraph No.10 in the counter affidavit filed by the third respondent and the same is extracted hereunder: "10. I hereby submit that the allegations made in Para 7 of the affidavit are all denied as false, frivolous and vexatious. It is the duty of the petitioner to make his tender to be present before on 27.05.2021 till 3.00 P.M. as it is all de-silting the channel for the water flow from Mettur Dam and the said public works been already utmost completed by the work order, which was already effected on 28.05.2021 itself, but suppressing the same this petitioner filed this petition on 07.06.2021 that too after 10 days of the said process and played before this Hon'ble Court by mis-representation to harass this respondent of the short term de-silting the channels and utmost completed, otherwise the flow of water River Cauvery from Mettur Dam which was opened already cause great hurdle to the agriculture of the South Tamil Nadu."
¶3The learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that the work was completed and the payment was also made to the contract.
¶4In view of the above, nothing survives in this Writ Petition and accordingly, the same is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
28.11.2023 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no tsg To
1.The Secretary, Public Work Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.
2.The Engineer in Chief, WRD and Chief Engineer (General), Public Work Department, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.
3.The Superintending Engineer,
4.The Chief Engineer,
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. tsg
28.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.7717, 7718 & 8262 of 2021 A.Pandian ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Secretary, Public Work Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Engineer in Chief, WRD and Chief Engineer (General), Public Work Department, Chepauk, Chennai- 600 005. 3.The Superintending Engineer, 4.The Chief Engineer, ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, directing the 3rd Respondent to call for the records of the entire impugned Tender proceedings of Tender Invitation No.1/2021-2021/va1/Naka. vava/Trichi/dated 18.05.2021 in respect of the Works items 2 to 5 and quash the same as illegal and void and consequently directing the 3rd respondent to conduct the fresh tender in respect of works items 2 to 5 and accept the petitioner's valid tender in respect of the works items 2 to 5 already submitted on 27.05.2021 at 01.32 p.m. (or) proceed with fresh tender proceedings. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Muraleedharan For Respondents : Mr.R.Ragavendran, Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.