- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 17 October 2023
- Bench
- N. Anand Venkatesh
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 10003/2021
Judgment
O RDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.Recording the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
17.10.2023
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No ta
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. ta
17.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH G.D.Rajasri Tigalya ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Regional Business Officer, State Bank of India RBO-2, Thanjavur & Thiruchirapalli Zone, Raja Mirasuthar Hospital Road, Thanjavur-613 001. 2.The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Manamelkudi Branch, Manamelkudi, Manamelkudi Taluk, Pudukottai District-614 620. 3.The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Main Branch, Pattukottai, Pattukottai Taluk, Thanjavur District-614 601. ...Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.04.2021 and consequentially direct the second respondent or the third respondent to sanction education loan of Rs.1,01,32,550/- without demanding any security to enable the petitioner to continue her MBBS course without any financial impediments. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Balakumaran For R3 : Mr.V.P.Rajan
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.