- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 25 July 2023
- Bench
- P.Dhanabal
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 8605/2020
Judgment
ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the impugned proceedings in Na.Ka.(A2)/3415/2020 dated 24.07.2020 on the file of the first respondent.
2.Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would contend that the above said petition filed to challenge proceedings under Section 107 Cr.P.C., and now, particular time was lapsed and thereby, nothing survives in this petition for further adjudication.
3.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) appearing for the official respondents also admitted the above said facts.
4.In view of the above submissions and considering the fact that already time was lapsed, this criminal original petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
25.07.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : gns To
1.The Assistant Commissioner (Ecercise) CumSub Divisional Magistrate Cum Revenue Divisional Officer (Incharge), Sivagangai.
2.The Inspector of Police, Ilayangudi Police Station, Sivagangai District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. P. DHANABAL
,J.
gns
25.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.07.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.4052 & 4053 of 2020 1.Nasar 2.Noor Mohammed 3.Abdul Rahman 4.Zakir Hussain 5.Abdul Jaffer ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The Assistant Commissioner (Ecercise) Cum Sub Divisional Magistrate Cum Revenue Divisional Officer (Incharge), Sivagangai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Ilayangudi Police Station, Sivagangai District. 3.Syed Hussain 4.Jirajideen 5.Vellaichamy 6.Swami Nathan 7.Murugan ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings in Na.Ka.(A2)/3415/2020 dated 24.07.2020 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Senthil For R1 & R2 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For R3 to R7 : Mr.B.Prasannavinoth
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.