- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 8 November 2023
- Bench
- S.M. Subramaniam, V. Lakshminarayanan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 8604/2023
Judgment
ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) The Writ Petition has been instituted questioning the validity of the notice issued under Section 258 of the Madurai Corporation Act, 1971.
¶2Learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and 3 made a submission that survey has already been conducted on
19.10.2023 and the authorities competent found encroachments on the streets. The writ petitioner along with nine others have encroached upon the streets and therefore, actions are initiated to remove the encroachments for the benefit of public at large / road users.
¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner raised an objection.
¶4The petitioner is granted one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order to submit his objections / explanations along with the documents, if any, and thereafter, the respondents are directed to consider the same, take a decision and remove all the encroachments within a period of four weeks therefrom.
¶5With these directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
(S.M.S., J.) & (V.L.N., J.)
08.11.2023
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No SJ To
1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Madurai.
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. SJ
08.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN and W.M.P.(MD) No.7917 of 2023 S.Rengammal ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Madurai. 2.The Madurai Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Anna Maligai, Madurai – 02. 3.The Asst Commissioner, Zone-1, East Madurai Corporation, Madurai – 02. 4.A.Muthuramalingam ...Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, call for the records of the 2nd respondent's impugned order bearing No.MI EI/007069/2022, dated 30.03.2023 in respect of the petitioner's husbands Patta Property in Old Survey No.1-2 and new Survey No. 153 T.S.No.111 in Block No.1 in Ward No.16 of Anthaneri Kanmoi, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai city and quash the same consequently direct the respondents 1-3 from interfering with the peaceful enjoyment of above said Patta Property at the instance of the 4th respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Siva Ilayaraja For Respondents : Mr.T.Amjadkhan Government Advocate for R1 Mrs.S.Devasena Standing Counsel for R2 and R3
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.