Ramesh.R v. South Indian Bank Ltd

O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.] Mr.R.Pandivel, learned Standing Counsel, takes notice for the respondent – Bank.

¶2Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent – Bank would submit that sale was not held due to want of bidders. Therefore, the first limb of the prayer has become infructuous.

¶3As regards one time settlement, learned Standing Counsel would submit that the proposal given by the petitioners for one time settlement has also been rejected.

¶4In view of the above submissions, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

[R.S.M., J.] [L.V.G., J.]

18.04.2023 (2/2) NCC : Index : Internet :

krk R.SUBRAMANIAN , J . and L.VICTORIA GOWRI , J . krk and W.M.P.(MD) No.8051 of 2023

18.04.2023 (2/2)

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI and W.M.P.(MD) No.8051 of 2023 1.R.Ramesh 2.R.Saravanan ... Petitioners -vs- 1.South Indian Bank Limited SIB HOUSE, Mission Quarters Thrissur-680 001 Kerala 2.The Authorized Officer South Indian Bank Madurai Regional Office 1st Floor, YMCA Building 70 Feet Road Ellis Nagar Madurai-625 016 3.The Branch Manager South Indian Bank Limited Madurai Main Branch No.3, LIC Building West Marret Street Madurai-625 001 ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order issued by the third respondent through his proceedings in Ref No:BR/GEN/197/2022-23, dated 03.12.2022 and the impugned tender-cum- auction sale notice issued by the second respondent dated 28.02.2023, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to consider and accept the one time settlement proposal dated 23.11.2022 given by the petitioners. For Petitioners : Mr.L.Shaji Chellan For Respondents : Mr.R.Pandivel, Standing Counsel