- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 13 April 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan, B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 8494/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side. We also heard the learned counsel for the intervenor.
¶2The petitioner has been served with notices under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905. It was followed by the order under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905. We were taken through the contents of the notices under Section 7 of the Act. Nowhere, it called upon the noticee to offer their objections. It is peremptory in nature. Therefore, the consequential order passed under Section 6 of the Act is also bad in law. There has been a clear violation of principles of natural justice. We therefore set aside the final order passed under Section 6 of the Act. Notice under Section 7 of the Act will be treated as show cause notice. The petitioner is given 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order to offer her objections before the third respondent. The third respondent shall hold enquiry. The intervenor also can very well associate himself in the said enquiry. The third respondent will hear the writ petitioner and Sri Meenakshi Sundareswarar, Nagara Sivan Kovil, A.Thekkur rep. by its trustee and thereafter pass final order. The petitioner will not adopt any dragging on tactics. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶3The Writ Petition is partly allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
[G.R.S., J.] [B.P., J.]
13.04.2023 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No rmi G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J and
B.PUGALENDHI, J. rmi To
1.The District Collector, Sivagangai District.
2.The Tahsildar, Thiruppathur Taluk, Sivagangai District.
3.The Zonal Deputy Tahsildhar, Thiruppathur Taluk, Sivagangai District.
4.The Block Development Officer, Thirupathur Panchayat Union Office, Sivagangai District. W.P(MD)No.8494 of 2023
13.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P(MD)No.8494 of 2023 and W.M.P.(MD)No.7837 of 2023 Rajeswari ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Sivagangai District. 2.The Tahsildar, Thiruppathur Taluk, Sivagangai District. 3.The Block Development Officer, Thirupathur Panchayat Union Office, Sivagangai District. 4.The President, A.Thekkur Village Panchayat, Thirupathur Taluk, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents Common Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the proceedings issued by the second respondent under Section 6 of Land Encroachment Act, 1905, dated 10.02.2023 and quash the same. For Petitioner :Mr.A.Arumugam For Respondents :Mr.K.Bala Subramani Special Government Pleader for R1 to R4 : Mr.R.M.Arun Swaminathan for intervenor
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.