Thangapandi v. Vishagan

O R D E R

The order passed by this Court had been complied with. A rejection order has been passed. It is for the petitioner to question the same in the manner known to law.

2.With this liberty to the petitioner, this contempt petition is closed.

31.08.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:-

1.Vishagan, District Collector, Dindigul,

2.Raja, Revenue Divisional Officer, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District.

3.Muthuraman, Thasildhar, Taluk Office, Kodaikanal,

4.Jessy Ghanasekar, Block Development Officer, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District.

5.Ragu, Village Administrative Officer, Villpatti Village, Villpatti, Kodaikanal Taluk, Dindigul District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias Cont.P.(MD)No.826 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.9055 of 2022

31.08.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 31.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Cont.P.(MD)No.826 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.9055 of 2022 Thangapandi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Vishagan, District Collector, Dindigul, 2.Raja, Revenue Divisional Officer, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District. 3.Muthuraman, Thasildhar, Taluk Office, Kodaikanal, 4.Jessy Ghanasekar, Block Development Officer, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District. 5.Ragu, Village Administrative Officer, Villpatti Village, Villpatti, Kodaikanal Taluk, ... Respondents Prayer: Contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the Contemnor/Respondent for willfully disobeying the order of this Court in WP(MD) No.9055 of 2022 dated 20.06.2022 under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Muneeswaran For Respondents : Mr.N.GA.Nataraj, Government Advocate.