VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

V.N.Arivazhagan v. The Managing Director

DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
24 April 2023
Bench
P.T. Ashaauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 9813/2020

Judgment

ORDER When the writ petition was taken up for hearing on 30.03.2023, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be posted today (24.04.2023) under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

24.04.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes abr To

1.The Managing Director, Tamilnadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation, No.11/12, Mangadusami Street, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034.

2.The District Collector, Collectorate Office, Theni District.

3.The Special Tahsildar, Tamilnadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd., Theni District.

P.T.ASHA, J. abr Dated: 24.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA V.N.Arivazhagan .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Managing Director, Tamilnadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation, No.11/12, Mangadusami Street, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. 2.The District Collector, Collectorate Office, Theni District. 3.The Special Tahsildar, Tamilnadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd., Theni District. 4.Thanikodi 5.Syed Abuthahir .. Respondents Prayer :- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing respondents 1 and 2 to take appropriate action against the 4th and 5th respondents and to forbear them from doing all the illegal activities and illegal transmission of Arasu Cable TV in Gudalur, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 14.07.2020. For Petitioner : No appearance For R1 : Mr.Abdul Saleem Standing Counsel For RR2 & 3 : Mr.D.Dhandiraj Special Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.