Shanmuga Sundaram v. The Superintendent of Police

ORDER Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous.

¶2In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infrucutous. No Costs.

19.04.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No NCC : Yes / No tta

To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Srivaikundam Division, Thoothukudi District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Seydhunganallur Police Station, Thoothukudi District. G.ILANGOVAN

, J.

tta

19.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Shanmuga Sundaram ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Srivaikundam Division, Thoothukudi District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Seydhunganallur Police Station, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the third respondent dated 08.04.2023 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents to grant permission and afford protection for conducting the Kabadi Tournment scheduled between 15.04.2023 at 7.00 p.m., and 16.04.2023 at 7.00 p.m., at Amman Kovil Ground, Muthalangurichi, Vittilapuram, Thoothukudi District and for usage of mike set during the above Kabadi Tournament. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Venkatesh For Respondents : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor