Swamydas.M v. The District Collector

O R D E R It is stated that the respondents have passed an order on

21.04.2023. Therefore, the petitioner may question that particular order in the manner known to law.

¶2Since the issue raised in the present writ petition has already been adjudicated by the respondents, giving liberty to the petitioner, if he is so advised, to question that particular order, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

12.06.2023 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No ssb To

1.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil.

2.The Commissioner, Nagercoil Municipal Corporation, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

C.V. KARTHIKEYAN, J. ssb

12.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN M.Swamydas ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil. 2.The Commissioner, Nagercoil Municipal Corporation, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. ...Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent not to disturb the petitioner's Outsourcing work contract and directing them to continue their workers to work in Nagercoil Municipal Corporation without any disturbances or threatening based upon his representation dated 06.04.2023 to the respondents. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Punitha Deva Kumar For Respondents : Mr.N.Muthu Vijayan Special Government Pleader for R1 Mr.F.Deepan for R2