VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Amusu v. The Special Tahsildar

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
30 March 2026
Bench
S Justice S.Srimathyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 8597/2026

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition is filed to issue a Writ of MANDAMUS directing the Respondents to issue a patta in the Petitioner's favour in respect of the property comprised in Survey Nos. 397/4, 397/5, 397/8, 397/14, 397/15, 397/16, 397/17, 397/18, and 397/19 particularly plot No. 135 to an extent of 0.01.0 Ares situated at Ponnamaravathi East, Ponnamaravathi Taluk, Pudukkottai District in the light of order passed by the 1st Respondent in Na.Ka.No.A2/938/2016 dated 21.01.2019 within time frame as fixed by this Court.

¶2The contention of the petitioner is that property to an extent of 0.01.0 ares in Plot No. 135 was acquired under the Adi Dravidar Welfare Scheme, and the same was divided into housing plots and assigned to various eligible persons in accordance with the rules and regulations. While so, certain individuals filed a suit in O.S. No. 44 of 2025 on the file of the Principal District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumayam, Pudukkottai District, seeking a declaration to declare the assignment order dated 20.04.2022 as null and void, and for an injunction restraining the official respondents from issuing patta in favour of the beneficiaries. After a full-fledged trial, the suit was dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, an appeal was preferred in A.S. No. 34 of 2012 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Pudukkottai, which was also dismissed. Another individual filed a suit in O.S. No. 262 of 2023 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Ponnamaravathi, in which the petitioner was impleaded as the fourth defendant, and the same was dismissed for default.

¶3In such circumstances, the petitioner is seeking issuance of patta. The petitioner has put up construction and is paying electricity charges and other taxes. Therefore, the official respondents submitted that patta had already been issued vide proceedings dated 21.01.2018, and the petitioner's name appears at Serial No. 3.

¶4Considering the rival submissions, this Court directs the second respondent to consider the petitioner's claim in the light of the order dated

21.01.2018 and pass appropriate orders within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶5With these observations, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

30.03.2026 Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No KSA To

¶1The Special Tahsildar, Adidravidar Welfare, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District.

¶2The Tahsildar Ponnamaravathi Taluk, Pudukkottai District.

S.SRIMATHY, J. KSA WP(MD) NO. 8597 of 2026

30.03.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Amusu Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Special Tahsildar, Adidravidar Welfare, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District. 2. The Tahsildar Ponnamaravathi Taluk, Pudukkottai District. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Alagusundar For Respondent(s): Mr.A. Oliraja, Government Advocate Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of MANDAMUS directing the Respondents to issue a patta in the Petitioners favour in respect of the property comprised in Survey Nos. 397/4, 397/5, 397/8, 397/14, 397/15, 397/16, 397/17, 397/18, and 397/19 particularly plot No. 135 to an extent of 0.01.0 Ares situated at Ponnamaravathi East, Ponnamaravathi Taluk, Pudukkottai District in the light of order passed by the 1st Respondent in Na.Ka.No.A2/938/2016 dated 21.01.2019 within time frame as fixed by this Court.

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.