K. Kathiravan v. The District Collector,

ORDER It is reported by the learned counsel for the petitioner that nothing survives for further consideration in the above writ petition, since the electric line has been drawn on an alternate pathway.

2.Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Speaking : Yes / No

18.04.2023 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No mm To The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.

P.T.ASHA, J. mm

18.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA and W.M.P.(MD) No.8935 of 2020 K.Kathiravan ... Petitioner /vs./ 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO, Samayanallur, Madurai District. 3.The Assistant Engineer, TANGEDCO, Samayanallur, Madurai District. 4.Bothairaj (R4 has been impleaded vide order dated 24.09.2020) ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the Respondents No.2 and 3 from erecting poles or towers or laying high tension wire or line over the petitioner's house property comprised in Survey No.111/6C2 situated at Maha Ganapathi Nagar, Power House, Samayanallur Post, Madurai District. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Jayaramachandran For R1 : Mr.D.Ghandiraj Special Government Pleader For R2 & R3 : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan Standing Counsel For R4 : No appearance