R.Subbiah v. Vallinayagam

ORDER When the matter has been taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that the orders of this Court dated 20.05.2022 has been complied with. The petitioner's representation has been rejected that the petitioner has not submitted the parental document. Moreover, there are differences between the extent of the property in field and the extent of the property in the document. This order has also been communicated to the petitioner.

2.Recording the above submission, this Contempt Petition stands closed.

01.09.2023 dsk To

1.The Tahsildar, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli.

2.The Taluk Surveyor, Rahdhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli. B.PUGALENDHI

,J.

dsk in W.P(MD)No.10254 of 2022

01.09.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI in W.P(MD)No.10254 of 2022 R.Subbiah ... Petitioner/Petitioner vs. 1.Vallinayagam, The Tahsildar, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli. 2.Mariappan, The Taluk Surveyor, Rahdhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli. ... Contemnors/Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the contmnor / respondent under the Contempt of Courts Act for willful disobedience of order of this Court passed in WP(MD)No.10254 of dated 20.05.2022. For Petitioner : Mr.H.Arumugam For Respondents : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Additional Government Pleader