M.A.Karikalan v. The Superintendent of Police

O RDER

This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent police not to harass the petitioner by frequently came to petitioner's computer center and insisted him to be appeared before the 2nd respondent's police station under the guise of enquiry, since the matter pertaining to the money dispute.

¶2The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that based upon the complaint given by the third respondent, enquiry is pending, summon was issued to the petitioner, the petitioner appeared once for enquiry and promised to produce the relevant documents for the above said enquiry. But later, he did not appear.

¶3The petitioner is directed to appear before the second respondent herein and produce all the documents that are available with him to show the service that was rendered by him to the third respondent.

¶4Now the allegation against the petitioner is that against the legal fees, the third respondent claims Rs.15,000/- extra.

¶5During the course of enquiry, if any trouble arises to the petitioner, he can workout his remedy through appropriate proceedings.

¶6With the above said liberty, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

17.04.20223 NCC:Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Indu To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Sub Inspector of Police, Vikkiramangalam Police Station, Madurai District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN. J. Indu

19.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD) No.7201 of 2023 M.A.Karikalan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Sub Inspector of Police, Vikkiramangalam Police Station, Madurai District. 3.Balakrishnan ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to direct the 2nd respondent police not to harass the petitioner by frequently came to petitioner's computer center and insisted him to be appeared before the 2nd respondent's police station under the guise of enquiry, since the matter pertaining to the money dispute. For Petitioner : Mr.A.D.Ganeshamoorthi For R1 and R2 : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor