- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 18 October 2023
- Bench
- N. Anand Venkatesh
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 10560/2021
Judgment
O R D E R When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the matter has already been settled between the parties. Recording the same, this writ petition stands closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
18.10.2023 NCC : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Index : Yes/No PNM
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. PNM ORDER IN and W.M.P(MD)Nos.8222 and 9872 of 2021
18.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.10.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and W.M.P(MD)Nos.8222 and 9872 of 2021 Pandiarajan ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Reserve Bank of India, through its Regional Director Fort Glacis, No.16, Rajaj Salai, Chennai 600 001. 2. The Branch Manager, Muthoothu Mini Financier Limited, No.34/4h, Ground Floor, Aruppukottai Main Road, Parameswariamman Kovil Street, Villapuram, Avaniyapuram (Post), Madurai – 12. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the 2nd respondent from auctioning the petitioner's jewels, which are pledged with the 2nd respondent for the loan relates with the Loan Account Numbers viz, 18113, 18903, 19397 and 20137 dehor to terms of the 2.0 circular issued by the 1st respondent, dated 06.08.2020 and 05.05.2021 and also without issuing proper notice to petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr. R.Suriya Narayanan For Respondents : Mr.P.Pethu Rajesh (R2)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.