- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 5 June 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 9015/2023
Judgment
O R D E R
This writ petition has been filed as against the enquiry report of the first respondent dated 20.03.2023 and the consequential impugned proceedings in Na.Ka.No.175/2023/A, dated 29.03.2023 of the second respondent, appointing the first respondent as a Domestic Enquiry Officer.
2.Today(05.06.2023), when this writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
3.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No Costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
05.06.2023 Index:Yes Internet:Yes vrn To
1.The Domestic Enquiry Officer-cum-District Revenue Officer, TASMAC Ltd, Madurai District.
2.The District Manager, TASMAC Ltd, Madurai South District. W.P(MD)No.9015 of 2023 B.PUGALENDHI,oJ. vrn Orderomadeoin W.P(MD)No.9015oofo2023oand WMP(MD)oNos.8173o&o8174oofo2023
05.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P(MD)No.9015 of 2023 and WMP(MD) Nos.8173 & 8174 of 2023 M.Ravikumar ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Domestic Enquiry Officer-cum- District Revenue Officer, TASMAC Ltd, Madurai District. 2.The District Manager, TASMAC Ltd, Madurai South District. ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the entire records pertaining to the impugned enquiry report of the first respondent dated 20.03.2023 and the consequential impugned proceedings in Na.Ka.No.175/2023/A, dated 29.03.2023 of the second respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Pitchaimuthu For Respondents : Mr.H.Arumugam
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.