VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Sankaranarayanan.C v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
25 April 2023
Bench
The Acting Chief Justice, R. Subramanian
Case no.
WP(MD) 9769/2023

Judgment

ORDER [Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble The ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE] With the consent of parties, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

¶2Mr.C.Sankaranarayanan, son of Chinnagovindhan, residing at No.167/35, Thiruvengadam Salai, Sankarankovil, Tenkasi District, has filed this writ petition for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to remove the encroachment made by R.Senthil Kumar, S/o.Ramakrishnan, the fourth respondent herein, in the common pathway in T.S.No.108, Block 12, Ward B, Thiruvengadam Road, Sankarankovil Municipality, Tenkasi District, on the basis of the representation dated

24.03.2023, within a time frame.

¶3Mr.A.Baskaran, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the first respondent; Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the second respondent and Mr.P.T.Thiraviyam, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the third respondent. Having regard to the nature of the order proposed to be passed in this writ petition, notice to the private respondent is dispensed with.

¶4Claiming that the fourth respondent while constructing the staircase to enter his house obstructed the common pathway in T.S.No.108, Block 12, Ward B, Thiruvengadam Road, Sankarankovil Municipality, the petitioner submitted a representation to the first respondent on 24.03.2023. Despite the representation dated

24.03.2023 made by the petitioner in this regard to the official respondents to take appropriate action, till date, no action has been taken by them. In support of his submissions, learned counsel also brought to our notice the photographs enclosed at page No.18 of the typed set of papers. A perusal of the photographs clearly shows that the fourth respondent by obstructing the common pathway, has raised the staircase to have access to his house by completely blocking the narrow lane. As a result, the ingress and egress of the people is affected. Hence, he prayed for allowing this writ petition.

¶5Learned Government Advocate appearing for the second respondent sought four weeks time to give notice to all the parties concerned and thereafter, to remove the encroachments in accordance with law.

¶6Recording the aforesaid submissions, without expressing any opinion on the prayer sought for by the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of directing the official respondents to remove the encroachments, after affording sufficient opportunity to all the parties concerned and by following due process of law. Such exercise shall be completed within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶7With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

[T.R., A.C.J.] [R.S.M., J.]

25.04.2023 NCC : No

Index : No Internet: Yes

PKN To

¶1The District Collector, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi.

¶2The Commissioner, Sankarankovil Municipality, Tenkasi District.

¶3The Town Surveyor, Sankarankovil Municipality, Tenkasi District. W.P.(MD)No.9769eofe2023 T.RAJA, A.C.J. and

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. PKN

25.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.04.2023 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.T.RAJA, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN C.Sankaranarayanan ... Petitioner -vs- 1. The District Collector, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi. 2. The Commissioner, Sankarankovil Municipality, Tenkasi District. 3. The Town Surveyor, Sankarankovil Municipality, Tenkasi District. 4. R.Senthil Kumar ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to remove the encroachment made by the 4th respondent in the common pathway in T.S.No.108, Block 12, Ward B, Thiruvengadam Road, Sankarankovil Municipality, Tenkasi District by considering the petitioners representation dated 24.03.2023, within time stipulated by this Honourable Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Veluchamy For R1 : Mr.A.Baskaran Additional Government Pleader For R2 : Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar Government Advocate For R3 : Mr.P.T.Thiraviyam Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.