VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Dr. Sivagurunathan v. Dr.Balu

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
3 April 2023
Bench
P.T. Ashaauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 10224/2020

Judgment

ORDER It is informed that the Ombudsman had already passed an order and nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition.

¶2Recording the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

03.04.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes abr To

1.The Authorized person for Non Banking Financial Ombudsman, Office of the Banking Ombudsman, C/o. Reserve Bank of India, Fort Glacis, Chennai-600 001.

2.The Ombudsman, Department of Non-Banking Regulation, Central Office, 2nd Floor Centre-I, World Trade Centre, Cuffe Parade, Colaba, Mumbai-400 005.

P.T.ASHA, J. abr Dated: 03.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA and W.M.P.(MD) No.9108 of 2020 Dr.Sivagurunathan .. Petitioner Vs. 1.Dr.Balu, Authorized person for Non Banking Financial Ombudsman, Office of the Banking Ombudsman, C/o. Reserve Bank of India, Fort Glacis, Chennai-600 001. 2.The Ombudsman, Department of Non-Banking Regulation, Central Office, 2nd Floor Centre-I, World Trade Centre, Cuffe Parade, Colaba, Mumbai-400 005. 3.Bajaj Finance Limited, Registered Office at Mumbai – Pune Road, Akurdi, Pune – 411 035, Maharashtra, India, Corporate Office at 4th Floor, Bajaj Finserve Corporative Office, Office: Pune – Ahmednagar Road, Viman Nagar, Pune – 411 014. 4.The Branch Manager, Bajaj Finance Limited, 3rd Floor, S.S.Tower, No.78/4, Ponmeni Road, Madurai-625 016. .. Respondents Prayer :- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 1 and 2 to take action against the 3rd and 4th respondents upon the petitioner's complaint dated 26.05.2020 and to further direct respondents 1 to 4 to consider the petitioner's loan account bearing Numbers 4120DLEY896453 maintained in the 4th respondent on the basis of the scheme of foreclosure and to accept the petitioner's amount paid to the tune of Rs.25,00,000/- dated 28.04.2020 and 22.05.2020 along with E.M.I. respectively, on the basis of the reserve banking proceedings No. DNBR(PD) CC.No.101/03.10.001/2019-20 dated 02.04.2019. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Krishnan For RR1 & 2 : Mr.K.R.Laxman Senior Panel Counsel For RR3 & 4 : Mr.I.Suthakaran

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.