VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

A. Jaya v. The Chairman

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
21 June 2023
Bench
P.T. Ashaauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 10178/2020

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition for a mandamus is filed seeking compensation from the respondents to the tune of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs only) for the death of the petitioner's husband Arjunan on account of electrocution in the third respondent's field.

¶2It is stated that the petitioner's husband had come in contact with an illegally erected electric fence belonging to the third respondent, as a result of which he had sustained electric shock and ultimately succumbed to his injuries. The petitioner would fairly admit that the third respondent was directed to pay compensation of a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs only) as an interim measure while granting anticipatory bail to the third respondent in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.14335 of 2019. The petitioner has moved this writ petition stating that it is the duty of the first and second respondents to take action against the third respondent for the illegal erection of the electric fence and since they had failed in their duty, they are liable to pay the compensation.

¶3Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-Board.

¶4None appears for the third respondent.

¶5Even according to the petitioner, the electric fencing had been put up by the third respondent illegally, thereby implying that the same was put without the knowledge of the respondent-Board. The petitioner has not been able to make out any ground that the accident had occurred on account of the negligence of the respondent-Board. Therefore, in the absence of such proof, the writ petition demanding compensation is not maintainable, particularly when the Board was in the dark about the electric fence. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

21.06.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes abr To

1.The Chairman, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, Anna Salai, Chennai.

2.The Executive Engineer, Operation & Maintenance, Kariapatti EB Office, Aruppukottai, Virudhu Nagar District.

P.T.ASHA, J. abr Dated: 21.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA A.Jaya .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chairman, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, Anna Salai, Chennai. 2.The Executive Engineer, Operation & Maintenance, Kariapatti EB Office, Aruppukottai, Virudhu Nagar District. 3.Samayamuthu .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.02.2020 and to direct the respondents to pay the compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- (Ten Lakhs Rupees only) for the loss of petitioner's husband named Arjunan, due to electrocution in third respondent's agricultural field. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Balamuruganantham For RR1 & 2 : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan Standing Counsel For R3 : No Appearance

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.