- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 19 April 2023
- Bench
- C.V. Karthikeyan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 8960/2023
Judgment
ORDER The writ petitioner had filed earlier writ petition in WP(MD)No. 16402 of 2022, seeking the very same relief and that was disposed on
27.07.2018. A direction was given to the fourth respondent therein namely Tahsildhar, Vilavancode Taluk, Kanyakumari District.
2.It is now represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the appropriate authority would be the second respondent therein, namely the District Revenue Officer, Kanyakumari District. The second writ petition filed by the writ petitioner for the very same relief is not maintainable. Such an order cannot be passed by this Court.
3.However, liberty is given to the petitioner to seek clarification for the earlier order dated 27.07.2018 in WP(MD)No.16402 of 2018, even filing writ miscellaneous petition, seeking clarification that orders should be issued against the second respondent not the fourth respondent therein. In the present writ petition, no order can be passed.
4.Since direction is given, this writ petition stands disposed. No costs.
19.04.2023 NCS :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet:Yes/No PNM To
¶1The District Collector, District Collectorate, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.
¶2The District Revenue Officer, District Collectorate Campus, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.
¶3The Revenue Divisional Officer, Padmanabhapuram, Kanyakumari District.
¶4The Tahsildar, Vilavancode Taluk, Kanyakumari District.
¶5The Village Administrative Officer, Vellamcode Village, Vilavancode Taluk, Kanyakumari District. C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J. PNM ORDER IN W.P(MD).No.8960 of 2023
19.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:19.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN W.P(MD).No.8960 of 2023 B.Nalini Amma ... Petitioner Vs 1. The District Collector, District Collectorate, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 2. The District Revenue Officer, District Collectorate Campus, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Padmanabhapuram, Kanyakumari District. 4. The Tahsildar, Vilavancode Taluk, Kanyakumari District. 5. The Village Administrative Officer, Vellamcode Village, Vilavancode Taluk, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent herein to rectify the mistake committed while updating the revenue records by erroneously classified the Resurvey No.85/10, Old Survey No.3225 of an extent of 11 Cents situate at Vellamcode Village, Arumani Post, Vilavancode Taluk, Kanyakumari District as a salaioram instead of private patta land. For Petitioner :Mr.S.Veeransamy For Respondents :Mr.N.Muthu Vijayan Special Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.