VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Murugesapandian.M v. The Superintendent of Police

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
20 April 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 9034/2023

Judgment

O R D E R The writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to grant permission to perform the program of Adal Padal program on 10.05.2023 night at about

6.00 p.m. to 11.00 p.m at Semapudur Village, Sri Pathrakaliamman Temple, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District and to provide adequate police protection based on the petitioners representation dated

15.04.2023.

¶2Mr.R.Suresh Kumar, learned Government Advocate (Crl. side), takes notice for the respondents. By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner submitted that Thiru Vizha of ASemapudur Village, Sri Pathrakaliamman Temple, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District, is going to be held on 10.05.2023. Subsequent to the same, in order to conduct a cultural programme on

10.05.2023, they sought permission of the Police by giving a representation dated 15.04.2023. But, the second respondent has not considered the said representation. Since no order was passed, the writ petitioner has come before this Court for the above said relief.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for the respondents would submit that he has no objection for granting permission to conduct a cultural programme subject to time restriction in between 07.00 p.m to 10.00 p.m. on 10.05.2023, and also submitted that the second respondent has received the representation of the writ petitioner and the same is pending for consideration.

¶5I have considered the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for the respondents.

¶6It is brought to the notice of this Court that the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai had issued a circular memorandum in Rc.007301/Genl.I (1)/2019, dated 09.04.2019, along with instructions to the Inspectors of Police throughout Tamil Nadu for consideration of applications seeking permission for conducting cultural programme. Therefore, in view of the detailed circular and guidelines issued by the Director General of Police, the second respondent is hereby directed to consider the representation of the writ petitioner, dated 15.04.2023 and pass suitable orders based on the above said circular, in the light of the above submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side).

¶7With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

20.04.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No TM To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Koppampatti Police Station, Koppampatti, Thoothukudi District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN, J TM Dated 20.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.04.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN M.Murugesapandian ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Koppampatti Police Station, Koppampatti, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to grant permission to perform the program of Adal Padal program on 10.05.2023 night at about 6.00 p.m. to 11.00 p.m at Semapudur Village, Sri Pathrakaliamman Temple, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District and to provide adequate police protection based on the petitioners representation dated 15.04.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sridhar For Respondents : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.