- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 25 April 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 7657/2023
Judgment
ORDER This Criminal Original Petition had been filed seeking for a direction against the respondents, not to harass the petitioner under the threat of foisting false criminal cases and the preventive action u/s 110 of Criminal Procedure Code, based on the petitioner's representation, dated 21.12.2022.
2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner is having one previous case. For that the respondents are monitoring the activities of the petitioner. Except that there was no harassment on the side of respondents and there is no proposal for initiating any action as against the petitioner.
3.Recording the said submissions made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of, as unnecessary.
25.04.2023 NCC:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Index:Yes/No PNM To
¶1The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi..
¶2The Inspector of Police, Tattarmadam Police Station, Thoothukudi District.
¶3The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
G.ILANGOVAN, J. PNM ORDER IN
25.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Ponnambala Nathan ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.. 2. The Inspector of Police, Tattarmadam Police Station, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying this Court to direction against the respondents, not to harass the petitioner under the threat of foisting false criminal cases and the preventive action u/s 110 of Criminal Procedure Code, based on the petitioner's representation, dated 21.12.2022. For Petitioner : Mr.Ananthi V Rajesh For R1 and R2 : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.