VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Lilly.G v. The Government of Tamilnadu

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
2 June 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 9408/2023

Judgment

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The petitioner's husband Thiru.P.Gunasekaran was employed in the respondent corporation as Selection Grade Driver. He passed away on 13.08.2022. The specific stand of the petitioner is that the retirement benefits have not been settled.

¶3Notice was issued. The respondents have not placed any material before this Court indicating the settlement of the retiral benefits.

¶4I therefore direct the respondents to settle the retiral benefits payable on account of the death of the petitioner's husband within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. Since the amount has not been settled in time, it will carry interest at the rate of 6% per annum.

¶5The Writ Petition is allowed accordingly. No costs.

02.06.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi To The Secretary to Government, Transport Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

02.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN G.Lilly ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Government of Tamilnadu Rep .by its Secretary to Government, Transport Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District. 3.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Trichy Region, Periyamilaguparai, Trichirappalli District. 4.The Chief Audit Officer, Corporate Office, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to sanction retirement benefits of the petitioner's husband namely P.Gunasekaran as follows:- Gratuity - Rs.6,53,095/- Earned Leave -Rs.4,03,100/- RBS -Rs.9,650/- Ex-gratia -Rs.8,400/- Erode Engineering College -Rs.740/- Erode Medical College -Rs.1,760/- Polytechnic -Rs.1,500/- I.R.D.Development Fund -Rs.500/- Family Welfare Fund of -Rs.5,00,000/- Moreover Family pension and other retirement benefits along with 6% interest per annum within time limit that may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Sudhagar Nagaraj For Respondents : Mr.K.Jagadeesbalan Standing Counsel for R2 & R3 : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader for R1

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.