VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Rajagopal. A v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
23 June 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 9192/2023

Judgment

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The writ petitioner is a retired employee of the respondent Corporation. His grievance is non-settlement of the surrender leave salary to him.

¶3The issue raised in the writ petition is no longer res integra. It is squarely covered by the order dated 04.10.2021 passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench in W.A.(MD)Nos.1883 to 1892 of 2021.

¶4Respectfully following the same, the respondents are directed to disburse the surrender leave salary to the petitioner herein in six monthly installments with 6% interest. The first installment shall commence from

20.07.2023.

¶5The writ petition is allowed accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

23.06.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To

1.The Secretary to Government, Transport Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

2.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.

3.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, Trichy Region, Periyamilaguparai, Trichirappalli District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

23.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN A.Rajagopal ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Transport Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District. 3.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, Trichy Region, Periyamilaguparai, Trichirappalli District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to settle the petitioner's benefit of encashment of Earned Leave (41 days) surrendered by petitioner's before the respondents 2 and 3 from the year 2010 to till the date of retirement of the petitioner with interest at 6% as per the 1998 Wage Settlement Effect under Section 12 (3) of ID Act, 1947. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Sudhagar Nagaraj For Respondents : Mr.G.Suriyananth Additional Government Pleader for R.1 Mr.K.Jagadees Balan Standing Counsel for R.2 & R.3

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.