VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Valliprapakaran v. The Inspector of Police

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
21 April 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 7391/2023

Judgment

ORDER This petition is filed seeking quashment S.T.C.No. 1480 of 2022 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Alangulam.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the first respondent.

3.The case of the petitioner is that on 25.07.2020, the petitioner herein abused the defacto complainant in filthy language. Hence, a case in Crime No.343 of 2020 for the offences punishable under Section 294(b) IPC has been registered against the petitioner. After completing the investigation, the first respondent has filed the final report before the concerned Judicial Magistrate and the same was taken on file in S.T.C.No.1480 of 2022. The present petition is filed to quash the S.T.C.No. 1480 of 2022 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Alangulam.

¶4Seeking quashment of the same, the petitioner has come up with this Criminal Original Petition, mainly on the ground that the offence alleged against the petitioner i.e., the maximum punishment for the offence under Section 294(b) IPC is three months or with fine or both.

¶5Since the FIR is registered on 01.08.2020, as per section 468(2)

(b) Cr.P.C., within a year Final Report ought to have been filed before the concerned Court. But, in the present case, even after a lapse of more than a year from the date of FIR (i.e) on 07.12.2022, Final Report has been presented before the concerned Court, which is barred by limitation.

¶6The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first respondent would submit that on verification with the Investigating Officer, it is revealed that the Final Report has been presented before the concerned Court on 07.12.2022.

¶7Heard both sides.

¶8It is seen from the records that FIR registered on 01.08.2020 and the final report has been filed only on 07.12.2022 (i.e.,) after a period of one year. Also a petition seeking extension of time under Section 473 Cr.P.C., has also not been filed before the concerned Court.

¶9In view of the forgoing reasons, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed. Case in S.T.C.No..1480 of 2022, pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Alangulam, is hereby quashed as against the petitioner herein. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

21.04.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : trp To

1.The Inspector of Police, Alangulam Police Station, Tenkasi District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN,J trp and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.6446 and 6448 of 2023 Dated: 21.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.04.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.6446 and 6448 of 2023 Valliprapakaran ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs. 1.The Inspector of Police, Alangulam Police Station, Tenkasi District. (Crime.No.343/2020) ... 1st Respondent/Complainant 2.Jawahar ... 2nd Respondent/De-facto Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records in S.T.C. No.1480 of 2022 pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Alangulam and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.Kumar.S For Respondent : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.