Rajendran v. The Dist. Collector

ORDER It is informed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the second respondent has passed the final orders on 21.01.2021 and therefore, nothing survives for consideration in the above writ petition.

2.Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Speaking : Yes / No

19.04.2023 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No To

1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Tahsildar, Sivakasi Taluk, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District.

P.T.ASHA, J. mm

19.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA Rajendran ... Petitioner /vs./ 1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Tahsildar, Sivakasi Taluk, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District. 4.S.Mohandoss 5.V.Krishnasamy 6.K.Muralidharan (R4 to R6 have been impleaded vide order dated 03.04.2023) ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to include the petitioner's name viz Rajendran, in the legal heir certificate of the petitioner's father (Late) Seenivasan, Certificate No.TN-7201907032240, dated 15.07.2019 issued by the 3rd respondent authority on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 11.05.2020. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan For R1 to R3 : Mr.D.Ghandiraj Special Government Pleader For R4 : Mr.S.Kadarkarai