VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Paulchamy.U v. The Management of

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
20 April 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 9158/2023

Judgment

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.The writ petitioner joined the respondent corporation as Driver in the year 1990. He retired from service on 30.11.2021. However, his terminal benefits were settled only on 26.03.2023.

3.It is well settled that for such belated settlement, the retired employee is entitled to interest. I, therefore, direct the respondent Corporation to pay the interest to the writ petitioner computed at the rate of 6% per annum on the belated disbursement from the date of retirement till date of settlement. The interest amount shall be paid within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4.This writ petition is allowed accordingly. No costs.

20.04.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

20.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN U.Paulchamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Madurai Region, Rep. By its Managing Director, Madurai. 2.The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Employee's Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Anna Salai, Chennai-2. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to pay the petitioner's interest at the rate of 6% per annum for the period of delay from 01.12.2021 to 26.03.2023, in paying the amount paid towards his terminal and pension benefits namely EPF Employee's Contribution, Gratuity, Encashment of Earned Leave and Commuted Value of Pension within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court and without affecting his right to claim balance amounts towards those benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Arunachalam For Respondents : Mr.Gladson Micheal Rajadurai Standing Counsel for R1 : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh Standing Counsel for R2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.