VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

P.Sasikala v. Jasmine Wilson,

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
7 June 2023
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
CONT P(MD) 930/2023

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner is the unsuccessful tenant in R.C.O.P.No.149 of 2014 filed by the first respondent herein. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners filed R.C.A.No.18 of 2018. Pending disposal of R.C.A.No.18 of 2018, the first respondent/tenant filed E.P.No.111 of 2018. The Rent Control Appellate Court/Princpal Sub Court, Tiruchirappalli dismissed R.C.A.No.18 of 2018 on

03.08.2022. E.P.No.111 of 2018 was allowed on 13.12.2021.

¶2Earlier, the petitioner filed CRP(MD)No.350 of 2022, pending disposal of R.C.A. The said civil revision petition was allowed by this Court on 25.03.2022. Thus, order dated 13.12.2021 was allowed .

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the property was demolished on 07.09.2022. It is therefore submitted that the respondents have committed contempt.

¶4On a query as to whether any other civil revision petition was filed by the petitioner against the adverse orders passed in R.C.A.No.18 of 2018 on 03.08.2022, the answer is in the negative. Therefore, there is no case made out for contempt. That apart, the respondent has succeeded in R.C.O.P.No. 149 of 2014 as early as on 13.12.2021. There is no case for contempt. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands dismissed.

07.06.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Sn C.SARAVANAN, J

Sn

07.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN In C.R.P.(MD).No.350 of 2023 1.P.Sasikala 2.A.Aijaz Ahamed ... Petitioners/Petitioners Vs. 1.Jasmine Wilson ...Contemnors/Respondent 2.Manimegali, 1st Additional District Munsif, Tiruchirappalli Combined Court Building, Cantonment Trichirappalli-1. ...Contemnors PRAYER: Petition filed under under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971, to punish the contemnors by ordering a compensation of Rs.10 lakhs to be paid to the petitioners and also by ordering punitive action against the contemnors in C.R.P(MD)No.350 of 2022, dated 25.02.2023. For Petitioners : Mr.M.Jahangir Baba

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.