Ponkumar v. The District Collector

O R D E R Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous.

¶3In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infrucutous.

05.06.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No tta To

1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2.The Sub Divisional Magistrate/Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Sivakasi East Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN,J tta Dated : 05.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.06.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Ponkumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2.The Sub Divisional Magistrate/Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Sivakasi East Police Station, Virudhunagar District. 4.Seenivasagan 5.Mugilan ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first and second respondent to take necessary action against the respondents 4 and 5 based on the petitioner's representation dated 07.03.2023 within the time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.Pon Karthikeyan For Respondents : Mr.B.Nambiselvam Additional Public Prosecutor