S. Chandrasekaran v. The Prl.Secretary to the Govt

ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous and therefore, nothing survives for further consideration in the matter.

¶2Recording the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

05.04.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi To

1.The Principal Secretary to the Government, Social Welfare and Nutritious Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.

2.The Commissioner, Social Defence Department, No.300, Purasavakkam Highways, Kellys, Chennai - 600 010.

3.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Theni District. P.T.ASHA

, J.

mbi

05.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA S.Chandrasekaran ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Principal Secretary to the Government, Social Welfare and Nutritious Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009. 2.The Commissioner, Social Defence Department, No.300, Purasavakkam Highways, Kellys, Chennai - 600 010. 3.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Theni District. 4.S.M.Sureshkumar ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take action against the fourth respondent as per Rules 16 and 19 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2017 by considering the petitioner's representations dated 08.07.2020 and 12.08.2020 within the stipulated time. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Jeganathan For Respondents : Mr.D.Ghandiraj, Special Government Pleader for R1 to R3 Mr.R.Karunanidhi for R4