- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 12 December 2023
- Bench
- S.M. Subramaniam, V. Lakshminarayanan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 9356/2023
Judgment
O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.] Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he is not pressing this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
¶2In view of the endorsement so made, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
[S.M.S., J.] [V.L.N., J.]
12.12.2023 (1/2) NCC : Index : Internet :
krk To:
1.The Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue Disaster Management, Department Service Wing (Ser.3(2)) Section, State of Tamil Nadu, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.
2.The Principal Secretary / Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.
3.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.
4.The District Collector, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi.
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. and V . LAKSHMINARAYANAN , J . krk and W.M.P.(MD) No.8385 of 2023
12.12.2023 (1/2)
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.8385 & 25222 of 2023 S.Subramanian ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The State of Tamil Nadu rep.by its Principal Secretary to Government Revenue Disaster Management Department Service Wing (Ser.3(2)) Section Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009 2.The Principal Secretary / Commissioner of Revenue Administration Chepauk, Chennai-600 005 3.The District Collector Tirunelveli District Tirunelveli 4.The District Collector Tenkasi District Tenkasi ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the notification in Re.A6/49282/2019, dated 21.03.2023, passed by the third respondent and the consequential proceedings by the fourth respondent in Na.Ka.No.A1/191/2022, dated 30.03.2023 and quash the same and direct the fourth respondent repost the petitioner as Tahsildhar. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ravi for Mr.Aayiram K.Selvakumar For Respondents : Mr.R.Baskaran Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.T.Amjad Khan Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.